Friday, October 31, 2008
Quote of the Day
- Obama at a campaign rally in Sarasota, FL as the crowd booed at the first mention of John McCain.
Thursday, October 30, 2008
Undecided?
To put them in perspective, I think of being on an airplane. The flight attendant comes down the aisle with her food cart and, eventually, parks it beside my seat. “Can I interest you in the chicken?” she asks. “Or would you prefer the platter of shit with bits of broken glass in it?”
To be undecided in this election is to pause for a moment and then ask how the chicken is cooked.
That's definitely funny, and a big part of me agrees. But perhaps it's also a bit harsh. A recent op-ed in the NY Times adopts a different perspective by articulating the undecided voter phenomenon as a reflection of the neuroscience and psychology of decision-making. It argues that many such voters have actually made a choice that has not yet gained enough confidence to reach the threshold of consciousness.
This might seem to rescue undecided voters from the accusation that they are out-of-touch or foolish. But I must admit, it remains puzzling to me how these "implicit choices" that ultimately mature into votes could be without intensity, force, or passion for so long when there is so much at stake.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Voted: Yes
Mass voters: note Question 2.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
News, yes--but paper?
23/6: Some of the News, Most of the Time
If you haven't seen their earlier videos, they're definitely worth watching:
First Presidential Debate in a Minute
Second Presidential Debate in a Minute
Third Presidential Debate in a Minute
VP Debate in a Minute
T Minus 7 Days
Via Andrew Sullivan: Obama at his most electrifying. Compare to any five minutes of McCain
Sunday, October 26, 2008
Of Mice and Memory
Research is also being done on mice with the opposite goal in mind: the erasure of uncomfortable memories. Check it out.
Advances in Printing
"Not counting nuts and bolts RepRap can make 60% of its parts; the other parts are designed to be cheaply available everywhere. This is an interesting coincidence: we can make 60% of our proteins; the other parts are evolved to be cheaply available everywhere..."
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Bachmann's Creepy Non-Apology Apology
"I may not always get my words right, but I know that my heart is right."
Friday, October 24, 2008
Promising News from FiveThirtyEight.com
FiveThirtyEight's composites of polling in battleground states:
Colorado: Obama +6.3The Bad news: Asterisks mark states where Obama's lead (according to this composite) is within the margin of error.
Florida: Obama +2.8*
Iowa: Obama +13.7
Indiana: Obama +1.6*
Missouri: Obama +1.7*
North Carolina: Obama +1.7*
Nevada: Obama +2*
Ohio: Obama +3.6*
Pennsylvania: Obama +10.7
Virginia: Obama +6.8
The Good news: Even if McCain wins every single one of the asterisked states, he won't reach 270 unless he also wins Pennsylvania's 21 EVs.
Thursday, October 23, 2008
Unusual and Cruel
Alicia in New York City asks, Do you think about having more children?"Zamboni Palin." It has a nice ring to-oh wait no it doesn't. That's just horrible. Growing up is hard enough without being named after a brandname for a gargantuan machine that smooths ice. "Maybe it has another meaning," I thought. Nope.
SP: No-o-o-o. We got our starting five. That's the final five.
Alicia also wondered if you had any more unique names up your sleeve.
SP: We did. We never got to get our Zamboni in. I always wanted a son named Zamboni.
Zam•bo•niAs long as you're going for a brandname, why not choose something a little softer, like "Kleenex?"
trademark
a brand of machine that smooths the surface of the ice on a rink
Confessions of an Ideologue
“I made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such as that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms,” Mr. Greenspan said.This is an impressive acceptance of fallibility from one of the most prominent free-market ideologues of our time. As the article posted below suggests, we shouldn't let the apparent failure of one ideology result in an intensified embrace of its opposite. Greenspan's comments shouldn't fuel a potentially misguided crusade against deregulation in all its forms, but rather invite a more thoughtful consideration of the limits of economic ideology in general.
Referring to his free-market ideology, Mr. Greenspan added: “I have found a flaw. I don’t know how significant or permanent it is. But I have been very distressed by that fact.”
Mr. Waxman pressed the former Fed chair to clarify his words. “In other words, you found that your view of the world, your ideology, was not right, it was not working,” Mr. Waxman said.
“Absolutely, precisely,” Mr. Greenspan replied. “You know, that’s precisely the reason I was shocked, because I have been going for 40 years or more with very considerable evidence that it was working exceptionally well.”
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
The Problem with Ideology
Some things never change—there will be bubbles and crashes, hindsight will be 20/20, and we will forget lessons hard-learned by our ancestors.
Words of the Day
Smackdown
There’s nothing like the feeling you get when you’ve got 100 kilos of heroin in the trunk of your car. Just to be near it, to smell it. Driving along at 120 mph in France somewhere and thinking: “I know what I’ve got in the car.” Police stopping beside you. A gun under my seat. Wouldn’t think twice about shooting them. Taking the risk. At the end of the day that’s why I became a drug dealer. Not the money or the power, but the buzz.
That's from an interview with Suleyman Ergun, formerly the "world's most prolific and powerful seller of smack," in Vice Magazine.
Lessons: 1) I think I lack a certain business acumen, 2) we're all just looking for our rush, and 3) "if you don’t have money, you have nothing."
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
A Good Read, Mind You
Anyway, maybe you'd better just read it.
Censure Bachmann!
Michele Bachmann's comments on Hardball:
I found a link to Censure Bachmann, an online petition to do just that and collect donations to support her opponent in the congressional race. I put the following in the comment box:
It is appalling that member of Congress could knowingly or unknowingly confound being anti-American with thinking, hoping or believing America could be different—perhaps better—than it is now. What is she doing in Washington? How can she legislate if the only thing she wants is exactly what we have? With what eyes does she view the country and see no flaws nor suspect she's missing them?

